On 03/11/2014 06:09 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
As the task nice value is in [-20, 19] and the io priority is in [0, 7],
and the convert method from niceval to ioprio is implemented with an
opened code in task_nice_ioprio().

This patch move the implementation to a macro NICE_TO_IOPRIO, making
it more readable and modular.

Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
  include/linux/ioprio.h | 7 ++++++-
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/ioprio.h b/include/linux/ioprio.h
index beb9ce1..c0faa0b 100644
--- a/include/linux/ioprio.h
+++ b/include/linux/ioprio.h
@@ -18,6 +18,11 @@
  #define ioprio_valid(mask)    (IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS((mask)) != IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE)
/*
+ * Convert the nice value [19,-20] to io priority value [0,7].
+ */
+#define NICE_TO_IOPRIO(nice)   (nice_to_rlimit(nice) / 5)
+

Hi Peter,
    As you asked, why I added this macro in ioprio.h? And why it is better?

IMO, there is a policy to convert a nice value to io priority, that divide the nice range into 8 parts by 5. I think this is a common requirement for lots of io subsystem.
So I implement this policy with NICE_TO_IOPRIO.

About function task_nice_iopiro(), it is to get the iopriority of a task. It should get the nice value at first and then use the NICE_TO_IOPRIO to convert it to ioprio in the policy.

When our policy changed, we need only update the center controller, NICE_TO_IOPRIO.
Keep the others work well.

This is my point about this patch. I wish it explained better. Thanx.
+/*
   * These are the io priority groups as implemented by CFQ. RT is the realtime
   * class, it always gets premium service. BE is the best-effort scheduling
   * class, the default for any process. IDLE is the idle scheduling class, it
@@ -52,7 +57,7 @@ enum {
   */
  static inline int task_nice_ioprio(struct task_struct *task)
  {
-       return (task_nice(task) + 20) / 5;
+       return NICE_TO_IOPRIO(task_nice(task));
  }
/*

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to