On Thu 2014-03-13 07:24:36, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 08:22 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Wed 2014-03-12 23:22:49, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > No. The power meter driver knows nothing about IPMI. It makes no IPMI
> > > calls. There's no requirement that a vendor implement it via IPMI.
> >
> > Yet you claim that IMPI is needed for that, and that's why you made
> > IMPI default.
>
> I claim that the ACPI spec defines the behaviour of IPMI operation
> regions, and so we should default IPMI to Y in order to (by default)
> implement the ACPI spec.
>
> > So ... do we need dmi-based blacklist?
>
> I don't see why.
Your reasoning for default y was that "power meter depends on
this". Then, claim that "power meter does not officially depend on it"
so it would be wrong to have a dependency.
Defaults are not right solution; system should still work if I select
non-default settings. Which you claim is not a case, but you don't see
why you should fix it.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
