On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletni...@vt.edu> wrote: > My kernel has CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n, which leads to hilarity... > > CC drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.o > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c:7079:13: error: > 'e1000e_pm_suspend' undeclared here (not in a function) > .suspend = e1000e_pm_suspend, > ^ > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c:7080:13: error: 'e1000e_pm_resume' > undeclared here (not in a function) > .resume = e1000e_pm_resume, > ^ > make[5]: *** [drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.o] Error 1 > make[4]: *** [drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e] Error 2 > make[3]: *** [drivers/net/ethernet/intel] Error 2 > make[2]: *** [drivers/net/ethernet] Error 2 > make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2 > make: *** [drivers] Error 2 > > Commit 38a529b5d4 claims to fix a related issue, but doesn't seem to do so > correctly. > > Author: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com> > Date: Thu Jan 16 14:39:39 2014 +0200 > > e1000e: Fix compilation warning when !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > > Commit 7509963c703b (e1000e: Fix a compile flag mis-match for > suspend/resume) moved suspend and resume hooks to be available when > CONFIG_PM is set. However, it can be set even if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not > set > causing following warnings to be emitted: > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c:6178:12: warning: > ‘e1000_suspend’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c:6185:12: warning: > ‘e1000_resume’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] >
I believe David Ertman fixed this and David Miller's net-next tree contains the patch that resolved this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
