Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> writes: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Rusty Russell <ru...@rustcorp.com.au> wrote: >> Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> writes: >>> Why not just do this with 0-base-address detection like my v2? That >>> would mean we don't need to remember to add this flag in the future to >>> imagined new architectures that might want this 0-based per_cpu >>> feature. >> >> Because future architectures will get this right and emit absolute >> symbols. I hope! >> >> I'm swamped at the moment, but am hoping to investigate that for >> x86-64. This is a stop-gap. > > Okay, I'm convinced. :) > > Acked-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> > > Thanks!
Applied, thanks. Cheers, Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
