Paul Davis wrote:
  [ the best solution is .... ]

  [ my preferred solution is ... ]

  [ it would be better if ... ]

  [ this is a kludge and it should be done instead like ... ]

did nobody read what andrew wrote and what JOQ pointed out?

after weeks of debating this, no other conceptual solution emerged
that did not have at least as many problems as the RT LSM module, and
all other proposed solutions were also more invasive of other aspects
of kernel design and operations than RT LSM is.

As I see it, what I said was in support of RT LSM (or at least the approach that RT LSM is taking) so why are you attacking me. I'm on your side :-)


Peter
PS I'm withdrawing the "unprivileged real time" feature from the spa_no_frills and zaphod schedulers in the PlugSched patch as a result of the discussions on SCHED_ISO and RT rlimits because the discussion convinced me that it's the wrong way to go.
--
Peter Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]


"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
 -- Ambrose Bierce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to