On 03/19/2014 10:16 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 18:26:44 +0800
Dongsheng Yang <[email protected]> wrote:

As Kees suggested, I use clamp() function to replace the if and
else branch, making it more readable and modular.

Suggested-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <[email protected]>
---
  kernel/sched/core.c | 11 ++---------
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 259ab85..85f4231 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3068,17 +3068,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(nice, int, increment)
         * We don't have to worry. Conceptually one call occurs first
         * and we have a single winner.
         */
-       if (increment < -NICE_WIDTH)
-               increment = -NICE_WIDTH;
-       if (increment > NICE_WIDTH)
-               increment = NICE_WIDTH;
-
Patch 2 and 3 need to be merged into a single patch.

Okey, I will squash them into one.

Thanx

-- Steve

+       increment = clamp(increment, -NICE_WIDTH, NICE_WIDTH);
        nice = task_nice(current) + increment;
-       if (nice < MIN_NICE)
-               nice = MIN_NICE;
-       if (nice > MAX_NICE)
-               nice = MAX_NICE;
+ nice = clamp_val(nice, MIN_NICE, MAX_NICE);
        if (increment < 0 && !can_nice(current, nice))
                return -EPERM;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to