On 6 March 2014 15:45, Sebastian Capella <sebastian.cape...@linaro.org> wrote: > Quoting Sebastian Capella (2014-03-05 02:50:04) >> Use of tracers in local_irq_disable is causes recursive aborts when >> called with irqs disabled and using a temporary stack (hibernation). >> Replace local_irq_disable with raw_local_irq_disable instead to >> avoid tracers.
> I have not heard any feedback on this change, since V3 of the > patchset. > Is everyone ok with this as it is? > Thomas, thanks for proposing this, is this looking ok to you? ping I haven't received any further communication / acks on this particular patch, since Russell's ~approval below: On 26 February 2014 15:37, Russell King - ARM Linux <li...@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > Great, I'm happy with this now. I assume that the plan is to submit this > to my patch system when everyone's given their fill of acks? Is this ok as it is? Thanks, Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
