On 03/21/2014 11:04 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> cpufreq_notify_transition() and cpufreq_notify_post_transition() shouldn't be
> called directly by cpufreq drivers anymore and so these should be marked 
> static.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <[email protected]>

Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat

> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 ++----
>  include/linux/cpufreq.h   | 4 ----
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index b63e7e4..7b1feff 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -331,16 +331,15 @@ static void __cpufreq_notify_transition(struct 
> cpufreq_policy *policy,
>   * function. It is called twice on all CPU frequency changes that have
>   * external effects.
>   */
> -void cpufreq_notify_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> +static void cpufreq_notify_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>               struct cpufreq_freqs *freqs, unsigned int state)
>  {
>       for_each_cpu(freqs->cpu, policy->cpus)
>               __cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, freqs, state);
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_notify_transition);
> 
>  /* Do post notifications when there are chances that transition has failed */
> -void cpufreq_notify_post_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> +static void cpufreq_notify_post_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>               struct cpufreq_freqs *freqs, int transition_failed)
>  {
>       cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
> @@ -351,7 +350,6 @@ void cpufreq_notify_post_transition(struct cpufreq_policy 
> *policy,
>       cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
>       cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_notify_post_transition);
> 
>  void cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>               struct cpufreq_freqs *freqs)
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 263173d..826830b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -338,10 +338,6 @@ static inline void cpufreq_resume(void) {}
>  int cpufreq_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned int list);
>  int cpufreq_unregister_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned int 
> list);
> 
> -void cpufreq_notify_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> -             struct cpufreq_freqs *freqs, unsigned int state);
> -void cpufreq_notify_post_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> -             struct cpufreq_freqs *freqs, int transition_failed);
>  void cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>               struct cpufreq_freqs *freqs);
>  void cpufreq_freq_transition_end(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to