Am Samstag, den 12.02.2005, 12:46 -0500 schrieb Arjan van de Ven: > On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 18:01 +0100, Kenan Esau wrote: > > > Second thing is that I am not shure that it is a good idea to integrate > > the lbtouch-support into the psmouse-driver since there is no real way > > of deciding if the device you are talking to is REALLY a > > lifebook-touchsreen or not. > ... > > IMHO the driver should be standalone and the user should decide which > > driver he wants to use. As default the touchscreen-functionality will be > > disabled and only the quick-point device will work like a normal > > PS2-mouse. > > I just want to point out that this is a problem for distributions and > for not-so-technical users. > > Is there *really* no way to know if you're on a lifebook? Can't you use > say the DMI identification mechanism to find this out ? If so, I think > integrating into the regular driver very much is the right thing to > do... it makes things JustWork(tm) for users without any need for manual > configuration (which also makes distribution makers happy).
Yes that would be nice. But the lifebook-touchscreen hardware is also used in other notebooks. For example the Panasonic Toughbook CF28. But we could still use DMI to check whether we are on a lifebook b-series and then initialize the hardware. This would still get 95% of all cases. For all the other ones we would have to provide some kind of force-switch. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
