On 25/03/14 11:19, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:25:42PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >>> On Thu, 9 Jan 2014, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >>>> Introduce CONFIG_PARAVIRT and PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING on ARM64. >>>> Necessary duplication of paravirt.h and paravirt.c with ARM. >>>> >>>> The only paravirt interface supported is pv_time_ops.steal_clock, so no >>>> runtime pvops patching needed. >>>> >>>> This allows us to make use of steal_account_process_tick for stolen >>>> ticks accounting. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]> >>>> CC: [email protected] >>>> CC: [email protected] >>>> CC: [email protected] >>>> CC: [email protected] >>>> CC: [email protected] >>>> CC: [email protected] >>>> CC: [email protected] >>> >>> Catalin, Will, are you happy with this patch for 3.15? >> >> It's pretty small and looks fine to me. However, I would like someone >> with more virtualisation experience than me to ack it (e.g. Marc Z). > > Ping? Marc, could you please give it a review?
Yup, that looks OK to me. It's a generic feature anyway, so I don't see any harm in enabling it for Xen. We may also use it for KVM at some point. Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]> M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
