On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Active_bases field of struct hrtimer_cpu_base is used at only one place, i.e.
> hrtimer_interrupt() and at that place too we can easily use
> timerqueue_getnext()
> instead to achieve the same result. I don't think this will have any
> performance
> degradation issues and so removing this field.
Instead of removing it we should actually use ffs and avoid the whole
looping. That was the intention in the first place, but I never wrote
the patch...
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
