On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 04:20 +0000, jimmie.da...@l-3com.com wrote:
> The example code submitted into bugzilla (chase back on the thread a > bit, there is a reference) shows the problem. > > Two threads, TaskA (high priority) and TaskB (low priority). Assigned > to the same processor, explicitly for the guarantee that only one of > them can execute at a time. Your priority based serialization guarantee does not exist. Tasks can be and are put to sleep. When that happens, a lower priority runnable task will run. Whether you like that fact or not, it remains a fact. If you don't want your lower priority task to run, why do you wake it?. -Mike > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
