At Tue, 1 Apr 2014 10:34:27 +0200, Struan Bartlett wrote: > > On 31 March 2014 14:34, Andreas Schwab <sch...@suse.de> wrote: > > One Thousand Gnomes <gno...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes: > > > >> It's however implemented and present. The rest is between you and the > >> relevant Kconfig maintainer. I'm sure you count as an expert ;-) > > > > Indeed. > > > > http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-kernel/2014-03/msg00071.html > > I have just completed an implementation of a tty driver for > netconsole, which I was about to submit as a patch. When the kernel > command line is set accordingly (console=netcon0), it has the desired > effect of taking over output to /dev/console when it is loaded. Would > you say this work is wasted, or that it's worth submitting the patch > anyway? > > There are differences to the ttyprintk approach. ttyprintk is > currently kernel-only, and not available as a module.
Actually, this can be easily fixed. I'm going to submit a patch (and another fix patch for the driver's error path). Note that they don't mean to object against your patching netconsole. I find also it more convenient to use directly netconsole. thanks, Takashi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
