On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 11:47:15AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > I'm a bit late in the game, but I feel a bit uneasy through looking > at the whole changes. My primary question is, whether do we really > need to share the same struct soc_enum for the onehot type? What > makes hard to use a struct soc_enum_onehot for them? You need > different individual get/put for each type. We may still need to > change soc_dapm_update stuff, but it's different from sharing > soc_enum.
Indeed, I had thought this was where the discussion was heading - not looked at this version of the patch yet.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
