On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 17:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com> wrote:
> So my current thinking is that the pre-existing code was erroneously > enabling tracepoints with the name of every event enabled (including > e.g. function tracer, kprobes, etc). It was not failing because > tracepoint.c silently accepted to enable tracepoints were not loaded > yet. > If that was true, than wouldn't the error code I added have returned an error? -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/