Hi, On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 23:29, Mitchell Blank Jr wrote:
> Of course that's less efficient though since "mask" is probably constant.. > so now the endian conversion changed from compile-time to run-time. > > Would something like > > ( ( EXT3_SB(sb)->s_es->s_feature_compat & cpu_to_le32(mask) ) != 0) > > be enough to satisfy sparse? Yes, but it breaks other places: there are a few places where callers actually want the real return value from the "&", so that (for example) they can tell the user which feature failed the compatibility test. --Stephen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
