Both the r128 and radeon drivers complain if they don't find an x86 option ROM
on the device they're talking to. This would be fine, except that the
message is incorrect--not all option ROMs are required to be x86 based. This
small patch just removes the messages altogether, causing the drivers to
*silently* fall back to the non-x86 option ROM behavior (it works fine and
there's no cause for alarm).
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
===== drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c 1.39 vs edited =====
--- 1.39/drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c 2005-02-10 22:57:44 -08:00
+++ edited/drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c 2005-02-15 15:51:19 -08:00
@@ -329,11 +329,9 @@
rinfo->bios_seg = rom;
/* Very simple test to make sure it appeared */
- if (BIOS_IN16(0) != 0xaa55) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "radeonfb (%s): Invalid ROM signature %x should be"
- "0xaa55\n", pci_name(rinfo->pdev), BIOS_IN16(0));
- goto failed;
- }
+ if (BIOS_IN16(0) != 0xaa55)
+ goto failed; /* not an x86 option ROM, bail out */
+
/* Look for the PCI data to check the ROM type */
dptr = BIOS_IN16(0x18);
===== drivers/video/aty/aty128fb.c 1.56 vs edited =====
--- 1.56/drivers/video/aty/aty128fb.c 2005-02-10 22:57:44 -08:00
+++ edited/drivers/video/aty/aty128fb.c 2005-02-15 15:51:40 -08:00
@@ -812,11 +812,8 @@
}
/* Very simple test to make sure it appeared */
- if (BIOS_IN16(0) != 0xaa55) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "aty128fb: Invalid ROM signature %x should be 0xaa55\n",
- BIOS_IN16(0));
- goto failed;
- }
+ if (BIOS_IN16(0) != 0xaa55)
+ goto failed; /* not an x86 option ROM, bail out */
/* Look for the PCI data to check the ROM type */
dptr = BIOS_IN16(0x18);
