On Tuesday 15 February 2005 18:44, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 05:25:54PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 23:04:06 +0100, Kay Sievers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 
> > > -static int class_device_dev_link(struct class_device * class_dev)
> > > -{
> > > -       if (class_dev->dev)
> > > -               return sysfs_create_link(&class_dev->kobj,
> > > -                                        &class_dev->dev->kobj, "device");
> > > -       return 0;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > -static void class_device_dev_unlink(struct class_device * class_dev)
> > > -{
> > > -       sysfs_remove_link(&class_dev->kobj, "device");
> > > -}
> > > -
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I can agree on dropping driver link but I think that the link to
> > underlying real device is still needed.
> 
> It's still there, read the patch :)
> 

Oops, missed that. Sorry.

-- 
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to