El 06/04/14 13:49, Joe Perches escribió:
On Sun, 2014-04-06 at 13:43 -0500, Joel Pelaez Jorge wrote:
Fix a sparse warning, non static symbol is no declared as such.
And fix a conflict with static function declared extern to include
rtl_wx.h header.

drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c:1323:24: warning:
symbol 'r8192_wx_handlers_def' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Joel Pelaez Jorge <joelpel...@gmail.com>
---
   drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c |    3 ++-
   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c
b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c
index 498995d..f17584d 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@

   #include <linux/string.h>
   #include "rtl_core.h"
+#include "rtl_wx.h"

   #define RATE_COUNT 12
   static u32 rtl8192_rates[] = {
@@ -1293,7 +1294,7 @@ static iw_handler r8192_private_handler[] = {
        (iw_handler)r8192_wx_get_PromiscuousMode,
   };

-static struct iw_statistics *r8192_get_wireless_stats(struct net_device
*dev)
+struct iw_statistics *r8192_get_wireless_stats(struct net_device *dev)
   {
        struct r8192_priv *priv = rtllib_priv(dev);
        struct rtllib_device *ieee = priv->rtllib;

As far as I can tell, there's no reason this should
be declared in the .h file and it should stay static
and not be exposed at all.


In the source "rtl_core.c" is possible to use the symbol
r8192_get_wireless_stats, if WIRELESS_EXT has specifics values.

Although this scenario is unlikely to happen, is better prepare
this code for it.

Also, a better way will be delete 'extern' reference to symbol
in header file and source file.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to