On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 09:18 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 04/03/2014 11:27 PM, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
> > This patch creates infrastructure to move the FAULT_AROUND_ORDER
> > to arch/ using Kconfig. This will enable architecture maintainers
> > to decide on suitable FAULT_AROUND_ORDER value based on
> > performance data for that architecture. Patch also adds
> > FAULT_AROUND_ORDER Kconfig element in arch/X86.
> 
> Please don't do it this way.
> 
> In mm/Kconfig, put
> 
>       config FAULT_AROUND_ORDER
>               int
>               default 1234 if POWERPC
>               default 4
> 
> The way you have it now, every single architecture that needs to enable
> this has to go put that in their Kconfig.  That's madness.  This way,
> you only put it in one place, and folks only have to care if they want
> to change the default to be something other than 4.

Also does it have to be a constant ? Maddy here tested on our POWER
servers. The "Sweet spot" value might be VERY different on an embedded
chip or even on a future generation of server chip.

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to