On Tue, 8 Apr 2014 19:49:51 +0200
Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 10:34:51PM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Tony Luck <tony.l...@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > c) If not this ... then what? Separate routine to convert large numbers
> > > of jiffies to usec/nsecs? Should we make the existing one barf when
> > > handed a number that overflows?
> >
> > Having thought about this a bit more - I'm leaning towards leaving
> > jiffies_to_usecs() alone, but using it as a model for a from-scratch
> > implementation of:
> > u64 jiffies_to_nsecs(const unsigned long j)
> > {
> > }
> >
> > This is what the uptime tracer actually needs - and there is only
> > one user of jiffies_to_nsecs() to worry about.
>
> I'm not sure I get what you're trying to do. We already have
> jiffies_to_nsecs().
> Anyway I'll just wait and check out the next patch :)
I believe the issue is the way it's implemented:
static inline u64 jiffies_to_nsecs(const unsigned long j)
{
return (u64)jiffies_to_usecs(j) * NSEC_PER_USEC;
}
The problem is with jiffies_to_usecs(). Which we probably should
change.
With HZ = 100,
1 second jiffies_to_usecs(100) = 1000,000.
1 minute jiffies_to_usec(6000) = 60,000,000.
1 hour jiffies_to_usecs(360000) = 3,600,000,000
1 hour 11 minutes 35 seconds -
jiffies_to_usecs(429500) = 4,295,000,000
2^32 = 4294967296 < 4,295,000,000
Overflow!
That means after 1 hour, 11 minutes and 35 seconds, jiffies_to_usecs()
will return a reset number. Time will go backwards. It doesn't matter
what you typecast the return value of jiffies_to_usecs() to, the result
is wrong.
Actually, I like Tony's first patch. I really think jiffies_to_usecs()
should return a u64 number.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
