On 04/09, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> @@ -167,18 +167,18 @@ static void check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks(unsigned 
> long timeout)
>               return;
>  
>       rcu_read_lock();
> -     do_each_thread(g, t) {
> +     for_each_process_thread(p, t) {
>               if (!max_count--)
>                       goto unlock;
>               if (!--batch_count) {
>                       batch_count = HUNG_TASK_BATCHING;
> -                     if (!rcu_lock_break(g, t))
> +                     if (!rcu_lock_break(p, t))

Not sure. And in any case this is suboptimal. Frederic, I'll write
another email tomorrow. In fact I already have the patch which changes
check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks() somewhere.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to