On 04/11, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:34:35 +0200 > Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 04/10, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 19:05:42 +0200 > > > Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > --- a/kernel/fork.c > > > > +++ b/kernel/fork.c > > > > @@ -1472,7 +1472,9 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned > > > > long clone_flags, > > > > > > > > total_forks++; > > > > spin_unlock(¤t->sighand->siglock); > > > > + syscall_tracepoint_update(p); > > > > write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock); > > > > + > > > > > > So this looks to be a fix that probably should go to stable? > > > > Not sure, this is up to you. > > I'll have to think about this one, whether or not it should go to > stable.
... > > > These changes should be in a separate patch, as they can wait till 3.16. > > > > OK, I'll split this change. > > Are you going to send a new series? Yes, will do. I will split 1/2, and I need to update the changelog in 2/2. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/