On 04/11, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:34:35 +0200
> Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On 04/10, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 19:05:42 +0200
> > > Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > --- a/kernel/fork.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> > > > @@ -1472,7 +1472,9 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned 
> > > > long clone_flags,
> > > >
> > > >         total_forks++;
> > > >         spin_unlock(&current->sighand->siglock);
> > > > +       syscall_tracepoint_update(p);
> > > >         write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> > > > +
> > >
> > > So this looks to be a fix that probably should go to stable?
> >
> > Not sure, this is up to you.
>
> I'll have to think about this one, whether or not it should go to
> stable.

...

> > > These changes should be in a separate patch, as they can wait till 3.16.
> >
> > OK, I'll split this change.
>
> Are you going to send a new series?

Yes, will do. I will split 1/2, and I need to update the changelog
in 2/2.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to