On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 04:04:55PM +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > drivers/input/serio/i8042.c: d4 -> i8042 (command) [78489009] > > drivers/input/serio/i8042.c: 07 -> i8042 (parameter) [78489009] > > drivers/input/serio/i8042.c: fe <- i8042 (interrupt, aux, 12) [78489014] > > Ok, this is a regular 'I don't know what you mean' response from the > pad. > > > drivers/input/serio/i8042.c: d4 -> i8042 (command) [78489014] > > drivers/input/serio/i8042.c: f3 -> i8042 (parameter) [78489014] > > drivers/input/serio/i8042.c: fc <- i8042 (interrupt, aux, 12) [78489018] > > But this return code is _very_ unusual. 0xfc means 'basic assurance test > failure' and should be reported only as a response to the 0xff command.
Kenan, can you check whether the 0xfc response is there even if you don't do the setres 7 command before this one? -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs, SuSE CR - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
