Hello.
OK, let me resend everything. This is what I am going to add to my tree
and ask Ingo to pull. I am still testing this all, seems to work so far.
Changes:
01-09: No changes, added the acks from Masami.
09-15: Updated the changelogs, the comments in 13/15, plus the
following renames:
- s/ttt/branch/
- s/disp/offs/
- s/_clear_displacement/_clear_offset/
No changes in compiled code, I preserved the acks from Jim.
>From 13/15:
Note: as Denys Vlasenko pointed out, amd and intel treat "callw" (0x66
0xe8)
differently. This patch relies on lib/insn.c and thus implements the
intel's
behaviour: 0x66 is simply ignored. Fortunately nothing sane should ever
use
this insn, so we postpone the fix until we decide what should we do;
emulate
or not, support or not, etc.
Yes. Lets discuss (and fix?) this separately, I'll write another email.
Any objections?
Oleg.
arch/x86/include/asm/uprobes.h | 16 +-
arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 551 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 31 +--
3 files changed, 372 insertions(+), 226 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
