The cpufreq core supports the cpufreq_for_each_entry macro helper
for iteration over the cpufreq_frequency_table, so use it.
It should have no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <strat...@semaphore.gr>
---
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
index 000e4e0..12a5750 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static unsigned extract_io(u32 value, struct
acpi_cpufreq_data *data)
static unsigned extract_msr(u32 msr, struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data)
{
- int i;
+ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos;
struct acpi_processor_performance *perf;
if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD)
@@ -223,11 +223,11 @@ static unsigned extract_msr(u32 msr, struct
acpi_cpufreq_data *data)
perf = data->acpi_data;
- for (i = 0; data->freq_table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
- if (msr == perf->states[data->freq_table[i].driver_data].status)
- return data->freq_table[i].frequency;
+ cpufreq_for_each_entry(pos, data->freq_table) {
+ if (msr == perf->states[pos->driver_data].status)
+ return pos->frequency;
}
- return data->freq_table[0].frequency;
+ return data->freq_table->frequency;
}
static unsigned extract_freq(u32 val, struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data)
--
1.9.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
