On Thu, February 17, 2005 9:24 pm, Tupshin Harper said: Hi Tupshin,
> Speaking as somebody that uses Darcs evey day, my opinion is that the > future of OSS SCM will be something like arch or darcs but that neither > are ready for projects the size of the linux kernel yet. Darcs is > definitely way too slow for really large projects (though great for > small to medium sized ones). Last I checked, Arch was still too slow in > some areas, though that might have changed in recent months. Also, many > people, me included, find the usability of arch to be from ideal. > > My hope and expectation is that Arch and Darcs will both improve their > performance, features, and usability and that in the not too distant > future both of them will be viable alternatives for large scale source > tree management. Falling into the same category probably is svk, although it's less mature than the options you cite. > The important thing for the health of the SCM ecosystem is that there be > ways to losslessly convert and interoperate between them as well as > between legacy/centralized systems such as CVS and SVN as well as with > BK. Amen. Thanks, Sean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/