On 15 April 2014 05:08, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote: > And that's wrong to begin with. > > Bugfixes first and then all other stuff. We dont want dependencies of > bugfixes on cleanups, reordering of code ...
Correct, should have taken care of this initially :( > Now looking at the thing some more, it contains gems like this: > > - printk(KERN_ERR "tick-broadcast: ignoring broadcast for " > - "offline CPU #%d\n", *oncpu); > + printk(KERN_ERR "tick-broadcast: ignoring broadcast for > offline CPU #%d\n", > + *oncpu); > > If you fix that checkpatch.pl line wrap issue, why do you not change > printk(KERN_ERR) to pr_err() as well? > > checkpatch.pl is happy, right? I did this for one patch and missed it for other.. I will fix all printk's in kernel/time/ now :) > Please send me the next series in the following way: > > - send a bug fix series, which does nothing else than fixing bugs. Right. > when that is applied, then > > - send a small batch of improvements for a particular issue and not a > mixed bag of random patches. Okay.. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
