After searching for the old property, bail out with -ENODEV
if it was not found.

It is unnecessary to check if oldprop is NULL before removing
its binary file; the check was already done before.

Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net>
---
 drivers/of/base.c |   10 +++-------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
index f72d19b..6d4ee22 100644
--- a/drivers/of/base.c
+++ b/drivers/of/base.c
@@ -1828,17 +1828,13 @@ int of_update_property(struct device_node *np, struct 
property *newprop)
                next = &(*next)->next;
        }
        raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devtree_lock, flags);
-       if (rc)
-               return rc;
+       if (!found)
+               return -ENODEV;
 
        /* Update the sysfs attribute */
-       if (oldprop)
-               sysfs_remove_bin_file(&np->kobj, &oldprop->attr);
+       sysfs_remove_bin_file(&np->kobj, &oldprop->attr);
        __of_add_property_sysfs(np, newprop);
 
-       if (!found)
-               return -ENODEV;
-
        return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.9.7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to