On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 23:18:19 +0100, Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 09:34:47PM +0000, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, David S. Miller wrote: > > > On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:45:55 +0100 > > > "d.c" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > 2) And more important, *nobody* works against "linus' bk head". > > > > > > I do, %100 exclusively, for all the networking and sparc > > > development. > > > > > > I never work against the -mm tree. > > > > Dito. All my kernel development happens against Linus' bk head and I > > almost never work against -mm tree. > > Same here, I work on Linus's bk head and all the changes go to -mm for > testing first, then to Linus for inclusion. >
I guess there is a perception that developers/maintainers are working against -mm because all maintainers trees are automatically pulled by Andrew. And when someone doing stuff on somewhat regular basis he/she tends to do it against maintainer's tree thus making patches suitable for -mm as well. -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
