Hi Jeff.
On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 17:52, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> What are the results of running irqbalanced?
You mean the debugging output? I can reenable it and record the results
if that's what you mean.
>From memory though, it got to not_worth_the_effort via this code:
if (tmp_loaded == -1) {
/* In the case of small number of heavy interrupt sources,
* loading some of the cpus too much. We use Ingo's original
* approach to rotate them around.
*/
if (!first_attempt && imbalance >= useful_load_threshold) {
rotate_irqs_among_cpus(useful_load_threshold);
return;
}
goto not_worth_the_effort;
}
(arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c:449.
Regards,
Nigel
--
Nigel Cunningham
Software Engineer, Canberra, Australia
http://www.cyclades.com
Ph: +61 (2) 6292 8028 Mob: +61 (417) 100 574
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
