Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 10:16 AM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix to enable readahead last NAT block
> 
> Hi Chao,
> 
> How about this?

This modification can really fix the previously deadloop problem without 
bringing
more problem. I'd like use your patch.
Thanks.

One comment as following.

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]>

> 
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 +
>  fs/f2fs/node.c | 6 ++++--
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index 55152de..556d06b 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ static inline void set_raw_extent(struct extent_info
> *ext,
>  struct f2fs_nm_info {
>       block_t nat_blkaddr;            /* base disk address of NAT */
>       nid_t max_nid;                  /* maximum possible node ids */
> +     nid_t available_nids;           /* maximum available node ids */
>       nid_t next_scan_nid;            /* the next nid to be scanned */
>       unsigned int ram_thresh;        /* control the memory footprint */
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index 837f5fd..5fb484c 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ bool alloc_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t
> *nid)
>       struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
>       struct free_nid *i = NULL;
>  retry:
> -     if (unlikely(sbi->total_valid_node_count + 1 >= nm_i->max_nid))
> +     if (unlikely(sbi->total_valid_node_count + 1 >= nm_i->available_nids))

Could we use the last valid nid and modify like this?

        if (unlikely(sbi->total_valid_node_count + 1 > nm_i->available_nids))

>               return false;
> 
>       spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
> @@ -1859,8 +1859,10 @@ static int init_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info
> *sbi)
>       nat_segs = le32_to_cpu(sb_raw->segment_count_nat) >> 1;
>       nat_blocks = nat_segs << le32_to_cpu(sb_raw->log_blocks_per_seg);
> 
> +     nm_i->max_nid = NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK * nat_blocks;
> +
>       /* not used nids: 0, node, meta, (and root counted as valid node) */
> -     nm_i->max_nid = NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK * nat_blocks - 3;
> +     nm_i->available_nids = nm_i->max_nid - 3;
>       nm_i->fcnt = 0;
>       nm_i->nat_cnt = 0;
>       nm_i->ram_thresh = DEF_RAM_THRESHOLD;
> --
> 1.8.4.474.g128a96c
> 
> 
> --
> Jaegeuk Kim
> Samsung

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to