Hi, On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Sangjung <sangjung....@samsung.com> wrote: > Hi Chanwoo. > > Thanks for your comments. I also add my opinion too. > > > > On 04/19/2014 04:13 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >> >> Hi Sangjung, >> >> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Sangjung Woo <sangjung....@samsung.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Add resource-managed extcon device register function for convenience. >>> For example, if a extcon device is attached with new >>> devm_extcon_dev_register(), that extcon device is automatically >>> unregistered on driver detach. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Sangjung Woo <sangjung....@samsung.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c | 72 >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> include/linux/extcon.h | 17 ++++++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c >>> b/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c >>> index 7ab21aa..e177edb6 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c >>> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c >>> @@ -819,6 +819,78 @@ void extcon_dev_unregister(struct extcon_dev *edev) >>> } >>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(extcon_dev_unregister); >>> >>> + >>> +/* >>> + * Device resource management >>> + */ >> >> This comment is un-necessary because this patchset(v3) remove 'struct >> extcon_devres'. >> >>> +static void devm_extcon_dev_release(struct device *dev, void *res) >>> +{ >>> + struct extcon_dev *devres = res; >>> + >>> + extcon_dev_unregister(devres); >> >> I prefer following function call withou defining separate 'devres' >> variable. >> But, this casting on the first argument is only for readability. >> extcon_dev_unregister((strcut extcon_dev *)res); >> > OK. I'll fix it. > > >>> +} >>> + >>> +static int devm_extcon_dev_match(struct device *dev, void *res, void >>> *data) >>> +{ >>> + struct extcon_dev *devres = res; >>> + struct extcon_dev *match = data; >>> + return devres == match; >> >> To simplify code, I think you could change checking code as following: >> return res == data; > > Right. Simple is better than others. > > >>> +} >>> + >>> +/** >>> + * devm_extcon_dev_register() - Resource-managed extcon_dev_register() >>> + * @dev: device to allocate extcon device >>> + * @edev: the new extcon device to register >>> + * >>> + * Managed extcon_dev_register() function. If extcon device is attached >>> with >>> + * this function, that extcon device is automatically unregistered on >>> driver >>> + * detach. Internally this function calls extcon_dev_register() >>> function. >>> + * To get more information, refer that function. >>> + * >>> + * If extcon device is registered with this function and the device >>> needs to be >>> + * unregistered separately, devm_extcon_dev_unregister() should be used. >>> + * >>> + * RETURNS: >>> + * 0 on success, negative error number on failure. >>> + */ >>> +int devm_extcon_dev_register(struct device *dev, struct extcon_dev >>> *edev) >>> +{ >>> + struct extcon_dev *devres; >> >> The 'devres' in this function don't mean 'device resource structure'. >> So I think it is not proper name. >> I think you should use other general name (e.g., 'ptr' or 'res' >> instead of 'devres') >> >>> + int ret; >>> + >>> + devres = devres_alloc(devm_extcon_dev_release, sizeof(*devres) >> >> Other subsytem used double pointer to get device resource from >> devres_alloc() instead of >> single pointer.(devres is single pointer) I can't find subsystem >> using single pointer of devm function. >> First of all, We have to analyze the correct reason using only double >> pointer instead of single pointer whether single pointer use is good >> or not. > > > IMO, other subsystem should return the memory pointer that is allocated by > devres_alloc(). > However, in our case, we need not do that since the pointer is used only in > extcon core. > You can refer the way that I did to gpio subsystem (devm_gpio_request() in > /drivers/gpio/devres.c).
As you comment, I checked 'devm_gpio_request' in drivers/gpio/devres.c . There are a little difference between devm_extcon_dev_register and devm_gpio_request. The second argument (unsigned gpio) is not pointer type in devm_gpio_request() But, devm_extcon_dev_register() needs the pointer type for second argument(struct extcon_dev *edev). > > >>> + GFP_KERNEL); >>> + if (!devres) >>> + return -ENOMEM; >>> + >>> + ret = extcon_dev_register(edev); >>> + if (ret) { >>> + devres_free(devres); >>> + return ret; >>> + } >>> + >>> + devres = edev; >>> + devres_add(dev, devres); >>> + >>> + return 0; >>> +} >>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_extcon_dev_register); >>> + >>> +/** >>> + * devm_extcon_dev_unregister() - Resource-managed >>> extcon_dev_unregister() >>> + * @dev: device the extcon belongs to >>> + * @edev: the extcon device to unregister >>> + * >>> + * Unregister extcon device that is registered with >>> devm_extcon_dev_register() >>> + * function. >>> + */ >>> +void devm_extcon_dev_unregister(struct device *dev, struct extcon_dev >>> *edev) >>> +{ >>> + WARN_ON(devres_release(dev, devm_extcon_dev_release, >>> + devm_extcon_dev_match, edev)); >>> +} >>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_extcon_dev_unregister); >>> + >>> #ifdef CONFIG_OF >>> /* >>> * extcon_get_edev_by_phandle - Get the extcon device from devicetree >>> diff --git a/include/linux/extcon.h b/include/linux/extcon.h >>> index f488145..35f3343 100644 >>> --- a/include/linux/extcon.h >>> +++ b/include/linux/extcon.h >>> @@ -188,6 +188,14 @@ extern void extcon_dev_unregister(struct extcon_dev >>> *edev); >>> extern struct extcon_dev *extcon_get_extcon_dev(const char >>> *extcon_name); >>> >>> /* >>> + * Resource-managed extcon device register function. >>> + */ >>> +extern int devm_extcon_dev_register(struct device *dev, >>> + struct extcon_dev *edev); >>> +extern void devm_extcon_dev_unregister(struct device *dev, >>> + struct extcon_dev *edev); >> >> I prefer that this function meet indentation of function definition >> needs as following: >> >> extern int devm_extcon_dev_register(struct device *dev, >> >> struct extcon_dev *edev); >> extern void devm_extcon_dev_unregister(struct device *dev, >> >> struct extcon_dev *edev); > > > I have a question about the indentation issue > since my Thunderbird email client does not show me the below line tidy. > > You want me to adjust the start point of the second line > to the right after parentheses of the first line. right? Right. Thanks, Chanwoo Choi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/