Peter, feel free to ignore 1-4, but could you look at 5/5? It lacks the test-case because I do not have a x32-ready testing machine.
On 04/17, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > This series only fixes the problem. I'll send more changes to address > some of TODO's mentioned in the changelogs later. In particular, we > need to do something with "callw", see "Note: in 13/15. So, what do you all think we should do with "callw"? Jim votes for declining to probe callw, and I fully agree. Any objection? Until then, lets cleanup the validate_insn_* paths and fix another bug. This cleanup can also simplify the next "reject callw" change. Oleg. arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 7 +- arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 126 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------ 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
