On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 09:07:45 +0900 Minchan Kim <minc...@kernel.org> wrote:

> Hi Vlastimil,
> 
> Below just nitpicks.

It seems you were ignored ;)

> >  {
> >     struct page *page;
> > -   unsigned long high_pfn, low_pfn, pfn, z_end_pfn;
> > +   unsigned long pfn, low_pfn, next_free_pfn, z_end_pfn;
> 
> Could you add comment for each variable?
> 
> unsigned long pfn; /* scanning cursor */
> unsigned long low_pfn; /* lowest pfn free scanner is able to scan */
> unsigned long next_free_pfn; /* start pfn for scaning at next truen */
> unsigned long z_end_pfn; /* zone's end pfn */
> 
> 
> > @@ -688,11 +688,10 @@ static void isolate_freepages(struct zone *zone,
> >     low_pfn = ALIGN(cc->migrate_pfn + 1, pageblock_nr_pages);
> >  
> >     /*
> > -    * Take care that if the migration scanner is at the end of the zone
> > -    * that the free scanner does not accidentally move to the next zone
> > -    * in the next isolation cycle.
> > +    * Seed the value for max(next_free_pfn, pfn) updates. If there are
> > +    * none, the pfn < low_pfn check will kick in.
> 
>        "none" what? I'd like to clear more.

I did this:

--- a/mm/compaction.c~mm-compaction-cleanup-isolate_freepages-fix
+++ a/mm/compaction.c
@@ -662,7 +662,10 @@ static void isolate_freepages(struct zon
                                struct compact_control *cc)
 {
        struct page *page;
-       unsigned long pfn, low_pfn, next_free_pfn, z_end_pfn;
+       unsigned long pfn;           /* scanning cursor */
+       unsigned long low_pfn;       /* lowest pfn scanner is able to scan */
+       unsigned long next_free_pfn; /* start pfn for scaning at next round */
+       unsigned long z_end_pfn;     /* zone's end pfn */
        int nr_freepages = cc->nr_freepages;
        struct list_head *freelist = &cc->freepages;
 
@@ -679,8 +682,8 @@ static void isolate_freepages(struct zon
        low_pfn = ALIGN(cc->migrate_pfn + 1, pageblock_nr_pages);
 
        /*
-        * Seed the value for max(next_free_pfn, pfn) updates. If there are
-        * none, the pfn < low_pfn check will kick in.
+        * Seed the value for max(next_free_pfn, pfn) updates. If no pages are
+        * isolated, the pfn < low_pfn check will kick in.
         */
        next_free_pfn = 0;
 
> > @@ -766,9 +765,9 @@ static void isolate_freepages(struct zone *zone,
> >      * so that compact_finished() may detect this
> >      */
> >     if (pfn < low_pfn)
> > -           cc->free_pfn = max(pfn, zone->zone_start_pfn);
> > -   else
> > -           cc->free_pfn = high_pfn;
> > +           next_free_pfn = max(pfn, zone->zone_start_pfn);
> 
> Why we need max operation?
> IOW, what's the problem if we do (next_free_pfn = pfn)?

An answer to this would be useful, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to