Those stats are counted counted in multiple places so that they can
confuse readers of the code.  This is a preparation of later change
and do not intend any functional difference.

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-report.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
index 76e2bb6cf571..375fc504386e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
@@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ struct report {
        const char              *cpu_list;
        const char              *symbol_filter_str;
        float                   min_percent;
+       u64                     nr_entries;
+       u64                     nr_samples;
        DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_bitmap, MAX_NR_CPUS);
 };
 
@@ -121,6 +123,12 @@ static int report__add_mem_hist_entry(struct report *rep, 
struct addr_location *
                        goto out;
        }
 
+       rep->nr_samples++;
+       if (he->stat.nr_events == 1) {
+               /* count new entries only */
+               rep->nr_entries++;
+       }
+
        evsel->hists.stats.total_period += cost;
        hists__inc_nr_events(&evsel->hists, PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE);
        if (!he->filtered)
@@ -176,6 +184,12 @@ static int report__add_branch_hist_entry(struct report 
*rep, struct addr_locatio
                                        goto out;
                        }
 
+                       rep->nr_samples++;
+                       if (he->stat.nr_events == 1) {
+                               /* count new entries only */
+                               rep->nr_entries++;
+                       }
+
                        evsel->hists.stats.total_period += 1;
                        hists__inc_nr_events(&evsel->hists, PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE);
                        if (!he->filtered)
@@ -212,6 +226,12 @@ static int report__add_hist_entry(struct report *rep, 
struct perf_evsel *evsel,
        if (ui__has_annotation())
                err = hist_entry__inc_addr_samples(he, evsel->idx, al->addr);
 
+       rep->nr_samples++;
+       if (he->stat.nr_events == 1) {
+               /* count new entries only */
+               rep->nr_entries++;
+       }
+
        evsel->hists.stats.total_period += sample->period;
        if (!he->filtered)
                evsel->hists.stats.nr_non_filtered_samples++;
@@ -490,20 +510,8 @@ static u64 report__collapse_hists(struct report *rep)
 {
        struct ui_progress prog;
        struct perf_evsel *pos;
-       u64 nr_samples = 0;
-       /*
-        * Count number of histogram entries to use when showing progress,
-        * reusing nr_samples variable.
-        */
-       evlist__for_each(rep->session->evlist, pos)
-               nr_samples += pos->hists.nr_entries;
 
-       ui_progress__init(&prog, nr_samples, "Merging related events...");
-       /*
-        * Count total number of samples, will be used to check if this
-        * session had any.
-        */
-       nr_samples = 0;
+       ui_progress__init(&prog, rep->nr_entries, "Merging related events...");
 
        evlist__for_each(rep->session->evlist, pos) {
                struct hists *hists = &pos->hists;
@@ -512,7 +520,6 @@ static u64 report__collapse_hists(struct report *rep)
                        hists->symbol_filter_str = rep->symbol_filter_str;
 
                hists__collapse_resort(hists, &prog);
-               nr_samples += hists->stats.nr_events[PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE];
 
                /* Non-group events are considered as leader */
                if (symbol_conf.event_group &&
@@ -526,7 +533,7 @@ static u64 report__collapse_hists(struct report *rep)
 
        ui_progress__finish();
 
-       return nr_samples;
+       return rep->nr_samples;
 }
 
 static int __cmd_report(struct report *rep)
-- 
1.9.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to