Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes:
> Il 21/04/2014 15:20, Bandan Das ha scritto:
>> + for (i = j = 0; i < max_shadow_read_write_fields; i++) {
>> +
>
> Extra empty line. Not a big deal, but...
>
>> + switch (shadow_read_write_fields[i]) {
>> + case GUEST_BNDCFGS:
>> + if (!vmx_mpx_supported())
>> + continue;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (j < i)
>> + shadow_read_write_fields[j] =
>> + shadow_read_write_fields[i];
>> + j++;
>
> ... you need to respin anyway because the j++ is wrong. It should be
> inside the "if". If you prefer, you can put it in the lhs of the
j++ outside the "if" looks right to me. Can you please explain why
you think it shouldn't be that way ?
> assignment, otherwise a separate statement is fine by me too.
>
> Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
