On Fri, 18 February 2005 11:12:45 -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> 
> In checkstack.pl, do you recall the reason for this code snippet:
> 
>               if ($size > 0x80000000) {
>                       $size = - $size;
>                       $size += 0x80000000;
>                       $size += 0x80000000;
>               }
> 
> There is one (unusual:) case where it fails.  Is it needed?

Something like this is needed, also for unusual cases.  gcc sometimes
decides to switch "sub 16" with "add -16".  Later, when the stack
frame is popped back, the exchange goes vice versa.

Without this code, you'd see a few cases of nearly 4GiB.

> For arch/i386/kernel/efi_stub.S, checkstack reports:
> 
> 0xc0116f5d efi_call_phys:                             1073741824
> which is 0x4000_0000 (_ added for readability only), however the
> actual change in %esp there is __PAGE_OFFSET (0xc000_0000 on ia32),
> 
> so if I alter the "if" test above to check for > 0xf000_0000,
> checkstack reports the correct value:
> 0xc0116f5d efi_call_phys:                             3221225472
> which is 0xc000_0000.
> 
> 
> from objdump of efi_stub.o:
>    5: 81 ea 00 00 00 c0       sub    $0xc0000000,%edx
> 
> or I can just ignore it, like I've been doing for awhile...

Changing 0x8000_0000 to 0xf000_0000 would work for the add case as
well.  Sounds like a sane change.

Checkstack could also do the ignoring for you, maybe like this:
        if ($size > 0xf0000000) {
                $size = - $size;
                $size += 0x80000000;
                $size += 0x80000000;
        }
        if ($size > 0x10000000) {
                $size = 0;
        }

Jörn

-- 
Ninety percent of everything is crap.
-- Sturgeon's Law
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to