On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:27:59PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com> wrote:
> 
> > @@ -1658,12 +1657,9 @@ static int serial_omap_probe(struct platform_device 
> > *pdev)
> >                 omap_up_info = of_get_uart_port_info(&pdev->dev);
> >                 pdev->dev.platform_data = omap_up_info;
> >         } else {
> > -               irq = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
> > -               if (!irq) {
> > -                       dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no irq resource?\n");
> > -                       return -ENODEV;
> > -               }
> > -               uartirq = irq->start;
> > +               uartirq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > +               if (uartirq < 0)
> > +                       return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> 
> 
> Maybe you could just do a 'return uartirq' here instead.

I don't mind either way, I'm only returning -EPROBE_DEFER because that's
what the other branch of this conditional returns. Tony, what do you
prefer ?

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to