On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 18:54:55 +0100 Jan Kara <[email protected]> wrote:
> There's no reason to hold lockbuf_lock when entering
> console_trylock_for_printk(). The first thing this function does is
> calling down_trylock(console_sem) and if that fails it immediately
> unlocks lockbuf_lock. So lockbuf_lock isn't needed for that branch.
> When down_trylock() succeeds, the rest of console_trylock() is OK
> without lockbuf_lock (it is called without it from other places), and
> the only remaining thing in console_trylock_for_printk() is
> can_use_console() call. For that call console_sem is enough (it
> iterates all consoles and checks CON_ANYTIME flag).
>
> So we drop logbuf_lock before entering console_trylock_for_printk()
> which simplifies the code.
>
I suppose we should document have_callable_console()'s locking
requirements, and I don't think that "early in boot" part is true?
---
a/kernel/printk/printk.c~printk-release-lockbuf_lock-before-calling-console_trylock_for_printk-fix
+++ a/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -1377,7 +1377,9 @@ static void zap_locks(void)
sema_init(&console_sem, 1);
}
-/* Check if we have any console registered that can be called early in boot. */
+/*
+ * Check if we have any console registered. Requires console_sem.
+ */
static int have_callable_console(void)
{
struct console *con;
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
