3.11.10.9 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me 
know.

------------------

From: Andy Grover <agro...@redhat.com>

commit 2c42be2dd4f6586728dba5c4e197afd5cfaded78 upstream.

ft_del_tpg checks tpg->tport is set before unlinking the tpg from the
tport when the tpg is being removed. Set this pointer in ft_tport_create,
or the unlinking won't happen in ft_del_tpg and tport->tpg will reference
a deleted object.

This patch sets tpg->tport in ft_tport_create, because that's what
ft_del_tpg checks, and is the only way to get back to the tport to
clear tport->tpg.

The bug was occuring when:

- lport created, tport (our per-lport, per-provider context) is
  allocated.
  tport->tpg = NULL
- tpg created
- a PRLI is received. ft_tport_create is called, tpg is found and
  tport->tpg is set
- tpg removed. ft_tpg is freed in ft_del_tpg. Since tpg->tport was not
  set, tport->tpg is not cleared and points at freed memory
- Future calls to ft_tport_create return tport via first conditional,
  instead of searching for new tpg by calling ft_lport_find_tpg.
  tport->tpg is still invalid, and will access freed memory.

see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071340

Signed-off-by: Andy Grover <agro...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <n...@linux-iscsi.org>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriq...@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/target/tcm_fc/tfc_sess.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/target/tcm_fc/tfc_sess.c b/drivers/target/tcm_fc/tfc_sess.c
index 4859505..639fdb3 100644
--- a/drivers/target/tcm_fc/tfc_sess.c
+++ b/drivers/target/tcm_fc/tfc_sess.c
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ static struct ft_tport *ft_tport_create(struct fc_lport 
*lport)
 
        if (tport) {
                tport->tpg = tpg;
+               tpg->tport = tport;
                return tport;
        }
 
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to