On 04/23, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Egad, this confused the heck out of me. I didn't notice the swap in > functions and was wondering what you were doing. I didn't realize this > is what you meant by moving the uprobe_perf_close() up. I was thinking > you moved the call up or something, not the function itself physically > in the file. ... > > You can add by Acked-by, but next time, please make this into two > patches. One to do the move, the other to do the change.
OK... I tried to lessen the number of patches I have ;) But I agree, this simple fix looks too complicated without preparation which only moves the code. Let me split it then. Result is the same do I preserved the acks, this is what I am going to add to my tree. Thanks! Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
