On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Westerberg, Mika <mika.westerb...@intel.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 06:18:38AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
>> I'm wondering why a pinctrl driver for an >> ACPI platform should be defining pinmux function groups. I haven't >> gotten a straight answer to that question. > > Are you asking why pinctrl-baytrail.c uses pinctrl_gpio_ranges even if it > is a pretty much standard GPIO driver? Mathias probably can answer that > question better than me. That was done on my request since any other approach obviously would lead to code duplication of exactly what GPIO ranges does. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/