On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 04:37:34PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> +static int apply_workqueue_attrs_locked(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
> + const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
> {
> struct workqueue_attrs *new_attrs, *tmp_attrs;
> struct pool_workqueue **pwq_tbl, *dfl_pwq;
> @@ -3976,15 +3960,6 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
> copy_workqueue_attrs(tmp_attrs, new_attrs);
>
> /*
> - * CPUs should stay stable across pwq creations and installations.
> - * Pin CPUs, determine the target cpumask for each node and create
> - * pwqs accordingly.
> - */
> - get_online_cpus();
> -
> - mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
lockdep_assert_held()
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
