On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 15:22 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> The dividers are available for UART and SPI on both
> Lynxpoint and Baytrail. With SPI, handling the dividers is
> optional, but in case of UART they should be adjusted
> according to the requested baud rate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.kroge...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
> index 69e29f4..508ac9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ struct lpss_device_desc {
>       unsigned int prv_offset;
>       size_t prv_size_override;
>       bool clk_gate;
> +     bool clk_divider;
>       struct lpss_shared_clock *shared_clock;
>       void (*setup)(struct lpss_private_data *pdata);
>  };
> @@ -119,16 +120,11 @@ static struct lpss_device_desc byt_pwm_dev_desc = {
>       .shared_clock = &pwm_clock,
>  };
>  
> -static struct lpss_shared_clock uart_clock = {
> -     .name = "uart_clk",
> -     .rate = 44236800,
> -};
> -
>  static struct lpss_device_desc byt_uart_dev_desc = {
>       .clk_required = true,
>       .prv_offset = 0x800,
>       .clk_gate = true,
> -     .shared_clock = &uart_clock,
> +     .clk_divider = true,
>       .setup = lpss_uart_setup,
>  };
>  
> @@ -246,8 +242,35 @@ static int register_device_clock(struct acpi_device 
> *adev,
>               parent = shared_clock->name;
>       }
>  
> +     if (dev_desc->clk_divider) {
> +             char *name = kzalloc(strlen(dev_name(&adev->dev)) + 8,
> +                                  GFP_KERNEL);
> +             if (!name)
> +                     return -ENOMEM;
> +             strcpy(name, "div_clk-");
> +             strcat(name, dev_name(&adev->dev));

Just kasprintf() instead of a few LOCs?

> +
> +             clk = clk_register_fractional_divider(NULL, name, parent, 0,
> +                                     pdata->mmio_base + dev_desc->prv_offset,
> +                                     1, 15, 16, 15, 0, NULL);
> +             parent = name;
> +
> +             name = kzalloc(strlen(dev_name(&adev->dev)) + 11, GFP_KERNEL);
> +             if (!name)
> +                     return -ENOMEM;
> +             strcpy(name, "clk_update-");
> +             strcat(name, dev_name(&adev->dev));

Ditto.

> +
> +             clk = clk_register_gate(NULL, name, parent,
> +                                     CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_SET_RATE_GATE,
> +                                     pdata->mmio_base + dev_desc->prv_offset,
> +                                     31, 0, NULL);
> +             parent = name;
> +     }
> +
>       if (dev_desc->clk_gate) {
> -             clk = clk_register_gate(NULL, dev_name(&adev->dev), parent, 0,
> +             clk = clk_register_gate(NULL, dev_name(&adev->dev), parent,
> +                                     CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
>                                       pdata->mmio_base + dev_desc->prv_offset,
>                                       0, 0, NULL);
>               pdata->clk = clk;


-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to