On 2014/4/25 23:13, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 11:32 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Well, I just ran another test too. I built a kernel (3.15rc2) with both >>> v3 of Doug's SDIO device enumeration patch - >>> http://dougvj.net/baytrail_gpio_quirk_v3.patch - and the new patch for >>> the IRQ allocation issue by Thomas Gleixner, >>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4051581/ . That kernel gives me a >>> working touchscreen. Note that >>> http://dougvj.net/baytrail_gpio_quirk_v3.patch includes both the blocks >>> you mention (i.e. it adds INT33FC in both places). >>> >>> So, it really seems like for me at least, it's the combination of Doug's >>> patch and your approach to fixing the IRQ allocation issue that breaks >>> the touchscreen. Thomas' approach, even combined with Doug's patch, >>> seems to work fine. >> >> Please make sure to provide a Tested-by: tag to Thomas so he >> knows this is merge material. > > Well, I'd rather someone test on the box that's actually affected by the > IRQ allocation conflict lockups so we can confirm it actually fixes > them :) >
I have tried the Thomas Gleixner's patch on 3.14.0 with i915 loading, the irq conflict disappears. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
