On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 07:06:17AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Saturday, April 26, 2014 at 05:10:13 AM, Huang Shijie wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 12:12:24AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > > the drivers may fills this hook itself, so the code should like
> > > > > > this:
> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > if ((info->flags & USE_FSR) &&
> > > > > >
> > > > > > nor->wait_till_ready == spi_nor_wait_till_fsr_ready)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > nor->wait_till_ready = spi_nor_wait_till_fsr_ready;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > I sense a misdesign of the SPI NOR subsystem here. The subsystem and
> > > > > the driver compete for a function pointer here ? I guess one should
> > > > > have precedence in some way then ... and also, they should be two
> > > > > different pointers, where the subsystem decides which to use.
> > > >
> > > > the subsystem do not decides which one to use, the driver decides which
> > > > one to use.
> > > >
> > > > If driver has its own @wait_till_ready , it means the driver knows the
> > > > feature, and has implemented it in its own @wait_till_ready.
> > > >
> > > > If the driver does not fill any wait_till_ready, it means the driver
> > > > will use the default @wait_till_ready. We can treat the
> > > > spi_nor_wait_till_fsr_ready as a default hook too.
> > >
> > > I see the driver overwriting a hook previously set by the subsystem. This
> >
> > not sure ;)
> >
> > The driver set the hooks before the subsystem set these hooks.
> >
> > If the driver has already set the @wait_till_ready hook before it calls
> > the spi_nor_scan, the subsystem will not set the hook anymore.
> >
> > Please see the spi_nor_check().
>
> Two things competing over the same pointer looks misdesigned to me. I will
> need
> to dig into this one more time ...
Please refer to the code for NAND chip, the nand_get_flash_type() :
-----------------------------------------------------------
/* Do not replace user supplied command function! */
if (mtd->writesize > 512 && chip->cmdfunc == nand_command)
chip->cmdfunc = nand_command_lp;
-----------------------------------------------------------
It uses the same logic:
" Do not replace user supplied command function!"
thanks
Huang Shijie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
