On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:24:08AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > We already do that with richacl. Richacl already have most of the > details implemented in common code. Comparing to recent posix acl > changes we could still simplify chmod and xattr bits. I will do that > in the next update.
There's still tons of duplication. There should be no code in the filesystem except for a few callouts for the inode init and chmod path, and the attr set/get should also be mostly in a library. If you need to add more than 20 lines to the filesystem you did something wrong. > > > - common data structure with Posix ACLs > > > > Can you explain this ?. Why do we want to do that ? One acl structure implementing the Posix and NFSv4 acls and instead of a big pile of duplicate infrastructure. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
