On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:09:20PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > I agree a numerical value is not flexible. But it sounds weird to put a > scheduler option in the sysfs and maybe more options will follow. > > I am wondering if we shouldn't create a new cgroup for 'energy' and put > everything in there. So we will have more flexibility for extension and we > will be able to create a group of tasks for performance and a group of tasks > for energy saving. > > Does it make sense ?
The old knobs used to live here: -What: /sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_mc_power_savings - /sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_smt_power_savings Not entirely sure that's a fine place, but it has precedent. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
