On pon, 2014-04-28 at 13:10 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > During suspend the IRQ should be disabled even if this is not a wakeup
> > source. This is a proper way of fixing the IRQ handling issue during
> > resume (IRQ handler fails because I2C bus did not resume yet).
> > 
> > When device is suspended and max14577 interrupt is signaled the irq chip
> > will try to handle it regardless of wakeup source. Device could be woken
> > up by different IRQ but still the IRQ handler will try to read the
> > registers over I2C bus and fail because I2C bus won't be ready yet:
> >     max14577 2-0025: Failed to read IRQ status: -5
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlow...@samsung.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/max14577.c | 29 +++++++++++++----------------
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> It's pretty worrying that these two patches are so alike and they
> actually change different files. Is there any way we can unify more of
> the code?
> 
> Patch applied, thanks.

This whole problem happens also on other MAXIM devices on our boards so
actually the real issue could sit in I2C bus controller or S3C PM
suspend/resume code. This is however the easiest fix for now...

Thanks for applying the patches.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to